I don't have anything to compare it to other than Tranzeo 900, but I
have had decent results with it. It obviously won't push the throughput
that 5G or even 2.4G will, even with the same channel sizes, but UBNT
salvaged most of my 900 customers when the Tranzeo gear started running
into problems.
On 08/22/2013 09:03 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
How is it junk? IIRC, everyone I've asked that claimed a given 900 MHz
system was junk had a poor RF environment.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Erik Anderson" <[email protected]>
*To: *"WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
*Sent: *Thursday, August 22, 2013 8:49:55 AM
*Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Latest trend for heavy wooded areas
98% of our terrain is heavily wooded. Ubiquiti 900 is junk (but their
other products perform quite well when they can be used). Cambium 900
is better. Out limited experience with whitespace has been good. All
of these technologies have very low bandwidth.
On 8/22/2013 12:04 AM, Chris Fabien wrote:
What are you guys deploying lately in heavily wooded areas? We've
used both Cambium pmp320 Wimax and UBNT M900, with mixed results
on both. We just put up a 130ft tower in a heavily wooded river
valley area, leaning towards the UBNT solution but hate putting
money into something I'm not really satisfied with.
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
