900 will move the same amount as data as 2.4, 3.65 and 5 GHz with all else 
being the same. 

If your throughput is low, you have too little signal for the noise you're 
seeing. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Sam Tetherow" <[email protected]> 
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 2:13:52 PM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest trend for heavy wooded areas 


I don't have anything to compare it to other than Tranzeo 900, but I have had 
decent results with it. It obviously won't push the throughput that 5G or even 
2.4G will, even with the same channel sizes, but UBNT salvaged most of my 900 
customers when the Tranzeo gear started running into problems. 


On 08/22/2013 09:03 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: 



How is it junk? IIRC, everyone I've asked that claimed a given 900 MHz system 
was junk had a poor RF environment. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Erik Anderson" <[email protected]> 
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 8:49:55 AM 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest trend for heavy wooded areas 


98% of our terrain is heavily wooded. Ubiquiti 900 is junk (but their other 
products perform quite well when they can be used). Cambium 900 is better. Out 
limited experience with whitespace has been good. All of these technologies 
have very low bandwidth. 

On 8/22/2013 12:04 AM, Chris Fabien wrote: 

<blockquote>

What are you guys deploying lately in heavily wooded areas? We've used both 
Cambium pmp320 Wimax and UBNT M900, with mixed results on both. We just put up 
a 130ft tower in a heavily wooded river valley area, leaning towards the UBNT 
solution but hate putting money into something I'm not really satisfied with. 


_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list [email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



_______________________________________________ 
Wireless mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 



_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list [email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
</blockquote>


_______________________________________________ 
Wireless mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to