I've heard that it's difficult to impossible to get more than one Ubiquiti 900 ap on tower regardless of channel separation. Have others found this to be true?
Robert wrote: > Funny (or not depending upon your point of view ) thing is that the best > results for throughput/penetration with 900Mhz was with the original > SR9's from UBNT. Better throughput by 2-3x than XR9 but less > interference resistance but being able to run smaller channels with the > same throughput made up for that. All that was from before 900 rollout > from the utilities and the 900 band turning into complete junk when the > power meters do updates and other heavy usage.. We tried the other UBNT > gear with not nearly the same results, but with and without external > antennas. > > On 08/22/2013 07:20 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> Ubnt 900 apparently has extremely poor nlos for 900 MHz. I've heard >> this a handful of people but haven't tried it myself. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> How is it junk? IIRC, everyone I've asked that claimed a given 900 MHz >>> system was junk had a poor RF environment. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: "Erik Anderson" <[email protected]> >>> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 8:49:55 AM >>> >>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest trend for heavy wooded areas >>> >>> 98% of our terrain is heavily wooded. Ubiquiti 900 is junk (but their other >>> products perform quite well when they can be used). Cambium 900 is better. >>> Out limited experience with whitespace has been good. All of these >>> technologies have very low bandwidth. >>> >>> On 8/22/2013 12:04 AM, Chris Fabien wrote: >>> >>> What are you guys deploying lately in heavily wooded areas? We've used both >>> Cambium pmp320 Wimax and UBNT M900, with mixed results on both. We just put >>> up a 130ft tower in a heavily wooded river valley area, leaning towards the >>> UBNT solution but hate putting money into something I'm not really satisfied >>> with. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wireless mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wireless mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wireless mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
