So here's what sparked the question. I was trying to get some point-counterpoint going on with a friend of mine and found some pretty good arguments on each. This article made me think about it all a little differently:
http://www.netcompetition.org/congress/the-multi-billion-dollar-impact-of-fcc-title-ii-broadband-for-google-entire-internet-ecosystem To Fred's point, the article mentions: "That’s because of the way the law and the forbearance provision are written; they apparently do not allow for any immaculate ruling where the FCC somehow rules the service and carrier of Internet traffic are regulated, but not the Internet traffic itself that is precisely what defines the service and carrier." Anyhow, not trying to beat a dead horse, but this got me questioning things :) Have a great weekend y'all! -drew On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Drew Lentz <d...@drewlentz.com> wrote: > So here's what sparked the question. I was trying to get some > point-counterpoint going on with a friend of mine and found some pretty > good arguments on each. This article made me think about it all a little > differently: > >
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
