currently only 3.65-3.7GHz is available to use under part 90.

CBRS opens up an additional 100MHz from 3.55-3.65GHz and changes the 
3.65-3.7GHz from part 90 to CBRS

The "citizens band” naming of CBRS is a poorly chosen name by the FCC and has 
nothing to do with the old “trucker” CB band.


Sean Heskett

ZIRKEL Wireless 
High-Speed Internet for NW Colorado
970-871-8500 x100 - Office
970-846-8065 - mobile
866-903-4628 - Fax
Website <http://www.zirkelwireless.com/> | Facebook 
<http://www.facebook.com/zirkelwireless> 

> On Dec 6, 2017, at 4:37 PM, Jan Van Kort <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I use that now, where does CBRS get tied to 3.6 equipment?  I read the fcc 
> blurb on cbrs and they didn't cover 3.6, only mentioned cb radios and 40 
> channels.  Didn't know anybody still used that stuff, grew out of that 40 
> years ago.
> 
> On 2017-12-06 03:05 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
>> CBRS is the 3.55-3.7GHz band (not 2.6-2.7) 
>> 
>> and yes there’s lots of equipment ready to use the band.  cambium canopy and 
>> all the LTE vendors have product.
>> 
>> Sean Heskett
>> 
>> ZIRKEL Wireless 
>> High-Speed Internet for NW Colorado
>> 970-871-8500 x100 - Office
>> 970-846-8065 - mobile
>> 866-903-4628 - Fax
>> Website <http://www.zirkelwireless.com/> | Facebook 
>> <http://www.facebook.com/zirkelwireless> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 6, 2017, at 3:58 PM, Jan Van Kort <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> CBRS? is there any wisp equipment available in the 2.6-2.7Mhz band?  Do you 
>>> really think a Verizon schill in charge of the FCC is going to give a crap 
>>> about what the citizens/tax-payers need or want?  The only thing he might 
>>> respect is a law-suit.  Protests would only help him laugh.
>>> 
>>> On 2017-12-06 02:12 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
>>>> Too many mailing lists, and it doesn’t help that most of mine sort into 
>>>> the same folder so it’s hard to tell which list a given posting is on.
>>>> 
>>>> I sent it to members just now.
>>>> 
>>>> Mark
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 6, 2017, at 4:12 PM, Rick Harnish <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mark, <>
>>>>>  
>>>>> Just curious, why was this not posted to [email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.  My experience tells me that this list is not 
>>>>> populated with near as many people as the members list is.
>>>>>  
>>>>> Respectfully,
>>>>>  
>>>>> ---------<image002.png>---------
>>>>> Rick Harnish
>>>>>  
>>>>> Director of WISP Markets
>>>>>  
>>>>> Baicells Technologies North America, Inc. <https://na.baicells.com/>
>>>>> Mobile:  (972) 922-1443
>>>>>  
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> www.facebook.com/baicells <http://www.facebook.com/baicells>
>>>>>  
>>>>>  
>>>>> From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>>> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] 
>>>>> On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 4:11 PM
>>>>> To: WISPA General List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] CBRS Spectrum - PLEASE DO THIS TODAY, TOMORROW, and 
>>>>> every day next week. It's time to ACT to save CBRS spectrum
>>>>>  
>>>>>  
>>>>>  
>>>>> The feedback we are getting back from DC is that certain parties at the 
>>>>> FCC noticed our #CBRS tags but didn’t think it was getting much traction. 
>>>>>    So… time to ramp it up.
>>>>>  
>>>>> Mark
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Dec 6, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Matt Hoppes 
>>>>>> <[email protected] 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Do you really think this is going to do anything though? It's very easy 
>>>>>> to post something like this on Facebook, but I feel like it really 
>>>>>> doesn't have any actual affect.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Kind of like some of the protesters we've seen in recent months and 
>>>>>> years where you have to ask yourself it's great that you have an opinion 
>>>>>> but is your protest really doing anything.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Dec 6, 2017, at 09:02, Mark Radabaugh <[email protected] 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> You all screamed a month ago when the CBRS order came out and wanted to 
>>>>>>> do something about it.   NOW IS THE TIME, and very few of you are 
>>>>>>> participating.   Please follow the instructions below.   
>>>>>>> This isn’t that difficult.  If you can’t figure it out, ask the 
>>>>>>> youngest person on your staff.
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>               The FCC is laughing at us - they know they sucked all the 
>>>>>>> air out of the room with Network Neutrality and they intentionally 
>>>>>>> timed the publication and comment deadlines for CBRS to bury them in 
>>>>>>> the NN controversy and the holidays.   And it’s working for them.
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> PLEASE post comments on your business and/or personal accounts on 
>>>>>>> Twitter, Facebook, and/or LinkedIn in support of CBRS.    
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 1)    Be part of our Twitter campaign: Take a clear picture of a rural 
>>>>>>> or small-town location near you that could be better served with fixed 
>>>>>>> wireless                                                   and CBRS 
>>>>>>> spectrum. Upload it to your social media account with language like the 
>>>>>>> following. Be sure to tag WISPA, your Members of Congress, and the 
>>>>>>> White House.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Please keep it professional and do not criticize any FCC commissioners 
>>>>>>> or other government officials; we need their support! You can identify 
>>>>>>> your Members of Congress by visiting www.House.gov 
>>>>>>> <http://www.house.gov/> or www.Senate.gov <http://www.senate.gov/>, and 
>>>>>>> their social media links will be listed on their websites.
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Twitter (no more than 280 characters):
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Dear @FCC: Here’s another area at risk of never getting broadband 
>>>>>>> service if you change the #CBRS rules to favor big mobile carriers. 
>>>>>>> Insert rural photo https://goo.gl/TKczyK <https://goo.gl/TKczyK> 
>>>>>>> [insert your member of Congress’s Twitter name here] @WhiteHouse 
>>>>>>> @WISPANews
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Calling all WISPA members, WISP customers, and allies: Help us tell 
>>>>>>> @FCC that the current #CBRS rules are helping to close the rural 
>>>>>>> broadband gap and should not be tinkered with! https://goo.gl/TKczyK 
>>>>>>> <https://goo.gl/TKczyK> [insert your member of Congress’s Twitter name 
>>>>>>> here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Dear @FCC: Don’t sink our hopes for rural broadband; keep the #CBRS 
>>>>>>> rules! https://goo.gl/TKczyK <https://goo.gl/TKczyK> [insert your 
>>>>>>> member of Congress’s Twitter name here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Attention @FCC: Don't take away rural consumers' best hope for finally 
>>>>>>> closing the broadband gap! Keep the #CBRS 
>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/hashtag/CBRS?src=hash> rules! 
>>>>>>> https://goo.gl/TKczyK <https://goo.gl/TKczyK> [insert your member of 
>>>>>>> Congress’s Twitter name here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Hey @FCC -- Don’t leave rural areas behind by changing the #CBRS rules 
>>>>>>> to favor the big mobile companies! https://goo.gl/TKczyK 
>>>>>>> <https://goo.gl/TKczyK> [insert your member of Congress’s Twitter name 
>>>>>>> here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> In the #CBRS <https://twitter.com/hashtag/CBRS?src=hash> spectrum band, 
>>>>>>> census-tract-sized PAL licenses are crucial for bringing broadband 
>>>>>>> internet to rural customers. https://goo.gl/TKczyK 
>>>>>>> <https://goo.gl/TKczyK> [insert your member of Congress’s Twitter name 
>>>>>>> here] @WhiteHouse @WISPANews @FCC
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Facebook and LinkedIn:
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Dear @FCC: Don’t leave rural areas like mine behind by changing the 
>>>>>>> #CBRS rules to favor the big mobile companies! 
>>>>>>> @Your-member-of-Congress: Please let FCC know your views! More info at 
>>>>>>> WISPA.org <http://wispa.org/>: https://goo.gl/TKczyK 
>>>>>>> <https://goo.gl/TKczyK>
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Any of the above options will work as well.
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 2)    The “easy way”:  Follow WISPA on these networks, watch for our 
>>>>>>> posts, and then “like,” “retweet,” “share,” etc. We will be using the 
>>>>>>> hashtag #CBRS.  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 3)    Down the road, we will ask you to contact your U.S. House and 
>>>>>>> U.S. Senate members; be prepared to draft your company’s official 
>>>>>>> comments to the FCC; and sign on to WISPA’s industry letters to the FCC 
>>>>>>> and/or Congress. Stay tuned!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> FOR MORE INFORMATION: 
>>>>>>> ·         Jimmy Carr, Chair of WISPA’s Legislative Committee, 
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>> ·         Mark Radabaugh, Chair of WISPA’s FCC Committee, 
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Mark Radabaugh
>>>>>>> WISPA FCC Committee Chair
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>> 419-261-5996
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Wireless mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
>>>>>>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Wireless mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
>>>>>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless>
>>>>>  
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wireless mailing list
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
>>>>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wireless mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
>>>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
>>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to