From: Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org> On Behalf Of graham.shanks via Wireshark-dev Sent: den 12 april 2019 09:04 To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Cc: graham.shanks <graham.sha...@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release lifetime and version number changes? >I think dropping the even/odd scheme is a good idea. I’m not sure. How would we label the development branch? It’s currently 3.1.0 or is it 3.1.0rc0? (Version 3.1.0 (v3.1.0rc0-521-gdba02458)) would people understand? But I’m ok either way. >Personally I'd go down to 2 active branches but then my group wouldn't be >adversely affected by dropping the "old old stable" version since we >invariably use the stable version. More weight should be given to the opinions >of people who do >use old stable versions. I would point out that the proposed >change gives no firm guarantee on the supported lifetime of a branch at all. >Could it be as short as two months? Potentially, since there would be nothing >to stop us releasing a branch >a month (unlikely, but from the user's >perspective they would have no control over that) For me 2 active branches sounds good. We use the development branch any way with our own ID marking. Regards Anders Sent from Samsung tablet.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
