> If FMP7 has gone multi-table, won't that require a significant amount
> of redesign/recoding to allow existing apps to take advantage of it?
It's been multi-table since version 4. But each table was a separate file.
Now it's multi-table in a single file like other dbs.
I assume all that's really required from the point of view of another app is
to readdress the datasource naming convention. Of course I can imagine the
WiTango programmers cringing at me telling everyone how easy their job is
without actually opening the bonnet. ;)
Also, remember that FMP is not just a datasource, but also a front end. And
it is backwards compatible with FMP6 apps so the cost of changeover for
existing users is minimal. I just created a simple two table solution in
FMP6 and converted to 7. Easy.
Wayne Irvine
Byte Services Pty Ltd
http://www.byteserve.com.au/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 02 9960 6099 Mob 0409 960 609 Fax 02 9960 6088
________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
