It is not someone elses problem. I have the responsibility to make
sure the tools I use are licensed. And if I am on the radar, I am
sure these other tools will be, sooner or later. If you think that I
wrote my own JPEG compression algorithm, then thanks for the
compliment. You think I am a better programmer than I am!
http://news.com.com/Do+you+own+everything+in+your+software+portfolio/
2010-1071_3-5794276.html?part=rss&tag=5794276&subj=news
--
Robert Garcia
President - BigHead Technology
VP Application Development - eventpix.com
13653 West Park Dr
Magalia, Ca 95954
ph: 530.645.4040 x222 fax: 530.645.4040
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bighead.net/ - http://eventpix.com/
On Jul 20, 2005, at 11:09 AM, Peter Dobbs wrote:
Why don't you use a simple COM object that handles this for you and
absolve
yourself of the problem altogether?
I use one called WebPic. http://www.softuarium.com/item.php?id=40
But there are TONS out there. See: www.componentsource.com
Let the licensing issue be someone else's problem.
p.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Wolfe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 11:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: JPEG Patent Issue
if it's any help, if you were forced to say "all photos must be png
format", an upside to using PNG is that it is lossless compression,
whereas jpg is lossy.
You might be able to get away with saying "to preserve image quality,
please use PNG compression" or soemthing like that
hope that helps in some small way, bummer to hear abotu your plight
On 7/20/05, Robert Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am doing the research, and looking carefully at the Unisys/gif
issue for education.
I can use PNG in some of my apps, and I love the PNG format, for the
most part, but I can't get around I have to use JPEGs to show
photographer's images online. PNG just doesn't have complete support
yet, and I also would have to investigate compression methods, and
which were supported on which browsers.
We are in the process of switching to JPEG2000 for transport, but I
better make sure that won't violate anything.
What does IANAL stand for? I am not a lawyer? Haven't seen that one.
It is nice to be noticed, but not by the IRS, or some Patent lawyer!
I always thought JPEG was royalty free, till seeing some news on the
web about forgent this year.
--
Robert Garcia
President - BigHead Technology
VP Application Development - eventpix.com
13653 West Park Dr
Magalia, Ca 95954
ph: 530.645.4040 x222 fax: 530.645.4040
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bighead.net/ - http://eventpix.com/
On Jul 20, 2005, at 6:57 AM, Scott Cadillac wrote:
Wow, that sux Robert,
I would try to find a support group somewhere that is dealing with
this, at
least for advice. There must be one somewhere.
I assume you've tried
IANAL, but if it were me, I'd investigate switching wholesale to
some other
format like PNG.
On the bright side, I guess you can say this is a measure of
success, simply
because you got noticed.
Hope things work out.
~ Scott Cadillac
~ 403-254-5002
~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~ Custom Software for Business
http://custom.softwarefor.net
~ The XML-Extranet Partnership
~ P.O. Box 69006
RPO Bridlewood SW
Calgary, Alberta
Canada T2Y 4T9
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 6:09 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Witango-Talk: JPEG Patent Issue
I have been sent letters, and have been phoned about software
that I
have written that compresses images using JPEG format. They want
percentages of revenue from the companies using the software.
Some background info:
http://www.shaftek.org/standardsblog/2005/04/27/the-never-endi
ng-jpeg-
patent-saga/
http://www.forgent.com/
The company contacting me is Inavisis.
I heard about Sony and Adobe buckling and paying the license,
and MS
and Apple fighting. I was wondering if anyone has done more
research
on this kind of thing, like the Unisys GIF issues before.
I know, if the JPEG patent is valid, I am violating it by using
open
source JPEG libraries to compress images, like ImageMagick. But
if I
use calls to the host operating system, or an API like Quicktime,
would I still be violating the patent?
It has always been my understanding, if a library like Quicktime,
allows me to save to a particular format, I am in compliance, cuz
Quicktime has the responsibility of being in compliance with
licenses.
If anyone has any info, I think this is a good topic of discussion,
cuz if I got on their radar, others will too. And then I
guess I will
have to write my own utilities for the webservers to manipulate
images, using quicktime. My desktop software too.
--
Robert Garcia
President - BigHead Technology
VP Application Development - eventpix.com
13653 West Park Dr
Magalia, Ca 95954
ph: 530.645.4040 x222 fax: 530.645.4040
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bighead.net/ - http://eventpix.com/
--
Robert Garcia
President - BigHead Technology
VP Application Development - eventpix.com
13653 West Park Dr
Magalia, Ca 95954
ph: 530.645.4040 x222 fax: 530.645.4040
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bighead.net/ - http://eventpix.com/
______________________________________________________________
__________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
____________________________________________________________________
__
__
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
_____________________________________________________________________
___
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
______________________________________________________________________
__
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
______________________________________________________________________
__
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
________________________________________________________________________
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
