Yaroslav Fedevych <jaroslaw.fedew...@gmail.com> escribió:

On Nov 9, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Carlos R. Mafra <crma...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sat,  9 Nov 2013 at 17:13:17 +0000, Rodolfo García Peñas (kix) wrote:

And the previous question was not replied, could you accept that
patch?

Yes, the patch will be accepted. But he is currently working in a
new version of it to address some comments.

I don't understand why the rush here.

People just are being worried and afraid. :-)

No. The people is making questions and the questions are not answered.

"Staying true to NeXTStep foundations", some worry, is a sure way to
make WM nothing more than a museum exhibit — something we all better
avoid, because WM (fortunately!) is a real piece of software used by
real people for real work. I personally hope I won’t need to compare
WindowMaker to Lenin’s body in its tomb for the next 40 years or so.

So when there is a prolonged silence in response to a patch, or an
idea, rumours start circulating, it’s kinda inevitable. Humans being
humans.


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.


Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)
http://www.kix.es/


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.

Reply via email to