On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:47:49AM +0200, csant wrote: > >On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 07:15:14PM +0200, Uriel wrote: > >>Oh, and forgot to mention all the broken mail sorting rules, email > >>accounts, etc, etc, etc. > > > >You are too pessimistic. If you'd invest the time you complain > >about the situation into being productive and updating existing > >links which haven't been updated yet > > The problem aren't the links he or you can update - it's more all those > online articles/reviews/whatnot that certainly will not be updated. A > typical user reads something, wants to check it out, gets a broken link, > thinks "oh well, another dead project". Few will think "and yet - I will > find it!" and start googling.
For those cases I can agree, but those who are really interested will google or visit freshmeat. I doubt that most will think "another dead project" without googling... Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
