On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 04:05:51PM +0900, Mauro Sauco wrote: > On 2006/10/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:53, <Anselm R. Garbe> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:47:49AM +0200, csant wrote: > > > >On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 07:15:14PM +0200, Uriel wrote: > > > >>Oh, and forgot to mention all the broken mail sorting rules, email > > > >>accounts, etc, etc, etc. > > > > > > > >You are too pessimistic. If you'd invest the time you complain > > > >about the situation into being productive and updating existing > > > >links which haven't been updated yet > > > > > > The problem aren't the links he or you can update - it's more all those > > > > online articles/reviews/whatnot that certainly will not be updated. A > > > typical user reads something, wants to check it out, gets a broken > link, > > > thinks "oh well, another dead project". Few will think "and yet - I > will > > > find it!" and start googling. > > > Anselm> For those cases I can agree, but those who are really > Anselm> interested will google or visit freshmeat. I doubt that most > Anselm> will think "another dead project" without googling... > > Why no reclaim the domain, announce retirement on the site and redirect. > or just cname it till everyone is happy with the retirement. (one year > wont cost more than 10USD) > > my two cents ..
I have no problem with that. So, if someone likes todo that, I can tell you when the domains are free again. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
