On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:19:17 +0200 Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > Hmm, I agree that the return foo() in void functions is ugly > (dunno why Kris made such stuff), but other things like the > array initialization are C99 compliant. Maybe you need some > special compiler flag? I'm not sure if shifts in enum > declarations are GNU style or C99 as well... Well...as far as I understand the manpage, it defaults to C99 (but it may not support all of C99). And adding the switch explicitly doesn't help anything. I just wonder what that standard is good for, if it makes things less portable...? Are there known workarounds? (So I could fix this for myself at least.) The most dangerous thing probably is that array initialization, where I'd have to make sure, to keep the inidices right.
> Out of curiosity, does my wmii-3.x libixp compile with this sun > compiler? Yes, it does, the whole wmii-3.1 including libixp, just out of the box. Regards, Stefan -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
