On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:03:04AM +0200, Stefan Tibus wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:27:32 +0200 Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > Can you check if dwm-1.9 compiles fine? I use some special array
> > initializations there as well (esp. in event.c and config.h).
> Hmm, maybe 
> void (*handler[LASTEvent]) (XEvent *) = {
>         [ButtonPress] = buttonpress,
>         [ConfigureRequest] = configurerequest,
>         [DestroyNotify] = destroynotify,
>         [EnterNotify] = enternotify,
>         [LeaveNotify] = leavenotify,
>         [Expose] = expose,
>         [KeyPress] = keypress,
>         [MappingNotify] = mappingnotify,
>         [MapRequest] = maprequest,
>         [PropertyNotify] = propertynotify,
>         [UnmapNotify] = unmapnotify
> };
> (from dwm event.c, line 332)
> works, but
> static Dirtab *dirtab[] = {
>         [FsRoot]        dirtab_root,
>         [FsDBars]       dirtab_bars,
>         [FsDClients]    dirtab_clients,
>         [FsDClient]     dirtab_client,
>         [FsDTags]       dirtab_tags,
>         [FsDTag]        dirtab_tag,
> };
> (from wmii-4 fs.c, line 125)
> not...

A random guess, but the = seems mandatory in my eyes...
It's too bad Kris cannot tell us why he used that syntax.

Regards,
-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe  ><><  http://suckless.org/~arg/  ><><  GPG key: 0D73F361

Reply via email to