On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 03:28:12PM +0100, Mathieu L. wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 03:09:00PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 03:02:49PM +0100, Mathieu L. wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 02:49:09PM +0100, thomas wrote: > > > > my 2 ¢: every editor lets me type in german or french with an azerty > > > > keyboard but acme: it has no support for dead keys -- blöd/bête. (That > > > > is way more annoying as the lack of syntax highlighting to me.) > > > > > > Doh, really no dead keys support in acme?? For a tool running on a > > > system coded by the guys who devised utf-8, that seems odd... > > > > I don't think it is the concern of an editor to care about key > > mappings. > > Agreed, but if in the end there's no dead keys support, there still is a > problem somewhere, no matter which component's fault it is in the > chain... > Note that I only tried a few times acme on Plan 9, so I don't even know > if that "missing dead keys" claim is true, or if that is simply a matter > of configuration. > Or maybe Thomas was talking about acme from the plan9port?
With acme form p9p I can enter any char I can enter in X as well. -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
