> Uriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The last 'combined' snapshot was somehow clobbered together, I don't >> know how, and I really don't see the point in doing it again. > > Did you read my post carefully? I'm not sure... I give you > two reasons there. > > Please make one think. You ask users for testing of the snapshot, > but you don't help them to do it. > >> And I'm sorry but I have no sympathy for willful cvs/svn users, they >> are like people insisting on using Ultrix in the 21th century, there >> is just no excuse not to install mercurial. > > You don't have to like me. I don't care about it. But your words > aren't even funny. Unfortunately there are simply stupid. > > I'm a happy cvs/svn users, because that SCMs do what I want. > Probably other are better, but I don't need them now. Is it > so hard to understand it? > > I guess you drive a new and modern car, because in 21th century > we shouldn't use the cars older then 7 years ;) > > Have a nice day, > > Pawel > >
I agree with Pawel. I don't see why its so hard to create a wmii+ixp snap, or just release a tgz of libixp like you do dmenu. I don't like having a package require a library that you can't download without installing mercurial. The "only excuse" is that you have a hybrid release pattern of some tgz, some required, some need mercurial. I tried moving my ixp headers from the old snap in and "making" but.. that didn't work. If I have to install mercurial, I guess I can but.. its just silly not to stay consistent. thanks, -Aaron
