Where the hell do all those links to hgtar come from? Blah, the hg setup at suckless.org really suck, I will be setting up something more sane at repo.cat-v.org.
By the way, I'm trying to come up with a minimally sane way to manage releases, pointers to scripts that automatically update freshmeat accounts and other such things are very appreciated (although I suspect I might end up doing it from scratch). Thanks for the mirror. uriel On 10/3/07, Aaron Grattafiori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I acctually don't use a package manager so, no its not that easy and I > normally don't have a problem. > When I went the "Development tip tarball: > http://suckless.org/hgtar.rc/libixp/tip"; > and got: > "Revision does not exist" > > I mirrored the bz2 here: http://dyn.neg9.org/pub/tip.tar.bz2 > Download away, we've got bandwidth. Thanks uriel. > > -Aaron > > > Given that apparently doing apt-get install mercurial (or equivalent) > > is such an incredibly huge hurdle for some people to over come, and > > that the web interface to hg in suckless.org sucks so much, I have > > mirrored the libixp repo at http://gsoc.cat-v.org/hg/libixp/ so you > > can pick whatever kind of archive format you like, (please note that > > this is just a temporary location and it will move to a more > > definitive place soon, and that cat-v.org runs on my dsl line, so > > please be gentle or donate so I can upgrade my bandwidth). > > > > Best wishes > > > > uriel > > > > On 10/3/07, Aaron Grattafiori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Uriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > > >> >> The last 'combined' snapshot was somehow clobbered together, I don't > >> >> know how, and I really don't see the point in doing it again. > >> > > >> > Did you read my post carefully? I'm not sure... I give you > >> > two reasons there. > >> > > >> > Please make one think. You ask users for testing of the snapshot, > >> > but you don't help them to do it. > >> > > >> >> And I'm sorry but I have no sympathy for willful cvs/svn users, they > >> >> are like people insisting on using Ultrix in the 21th century, there > >> >> is just no excuse not to install mercurial. > >> > > >> > You don't have to like me. I don't care about it. But your words > >> > aren't even funny. Unfortunately there are simply stupid. > >> > > >> > I'm a happy cvs/svn users, because that SCMs do what I want. > >> > Probably other are better, but I don't need them now. Is it > >> > so hard to understand it? > >> > > >> > I guess you drive a new and modern car, because in 21th century > >> > we shouldn't use the cars older then 7 years ;) > >> > > >> > Have a nice day, > >> > > >> > Pawel > >> > > >> > > >> > >> I agree with Pawel. I don't see why its so hard to create a wmii+ixp > >> snap, > >> or just release a tgz of libixp like you do dmenu. I don't like having a > >> package require a library that you can't download without installing > >> mercurial. The "only excuse" is that you have a hybrid release pattern > >> of > >> some tgz, some required, some need mercurial. I tried moving my ixp > >> headers from the old snap in and "making" but.. that didn't work. If I > >> have to install mercurial, I guess I can but.. its just silly not to > >> stay > >> consistent. > >> > >> thanks, > >> > >> -Aaron > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
