I think it's quite nice. Being able to edit a bunch of pages, view changed files, review a diff, then revert file changes if needed all from the command line (if I so choose) is quite convenient. I also like being able to edit a large number of pages in VIM and manage the changes in mercurius and as I prefer the command line, this is probably the least obtrusive method for me to edit the wiki.
Though I admit that since I liked git based wiki solutions as well, I may be a bit biased. Thomas On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 01:52:19PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > 2008/8/17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > who are these others besides kris? did they update stuff on this > > hgikiriki yet? it doesnt seem so to me. i used to correct and update > > small parts of the old wiki, but that hg shit goes much too far. > > I think you haven't tried or understood how hgiki works. If you pull > wmii source code using hg, there is no reason not to contribute to the > wiki using hg. IMHO it's even much better than any other wiki I used > before, because everyone can define the structure, the content, and > even prevent conflicts with your favorite tools of choice. > > Kind regards, > --Anselm >
