So if the command is `mount -t 9p ...` then what is wrong with
referring to it as 9pfs ? perhaps there is a problem with the way '9p'
is used in the linux impl.
Uriel wrote:
Uhu? I think you are confused, see http://9p.cat-v.org/implementations and /faq
9P2000 is the latest version of the protocol, used by pretty much
everyone using 9P.
The linux kernel implementation is called v9fs.
uriel
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Robert C Corsaro <[email protected]> wrote:
Uriel wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Michael Stapelberg
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Kris,
* [30.01.09 03:46]:
You're right, libixp should certainly not try to call methods that
aren't
implemented. But, you haven't attached a patch.
I'm sorry, it's getting late ;-). Find the patch attached now.
3) When writing "Fullscreen toggle" to /client/sel/ctl, something
(probably
9pfs) produces a hard-lockup (sound freezes, X11 freezes, nothing
possible
no more, just reboot). This may be related to 2). I'm not sure how to
further debug this.
I don't know how wmii could cause this. It could certainly freeze X11,
and so probably any badly written audio player (e.g., xmms), but
I'm using cmus, which does not seem to be written so badly ;-).
certainly not lock up your computer. Can you ssh in? Are you using 9pfs?
That *could* certainly lock up your computer, but it shouldn't.
SSHing in is not possible. Yes, I'm using 9pfs. I think it could be wstat
not
being implemented or something like this causing an endless loop in 9pfs
or similar?
What is 9pfs? You mean v9fs? If so, *sigh*
uriel
The linux impl is called 9p2000 and type is 9p when mounting :P
