On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Robert C Corsaro <[email protected]> wrote: > So if the command is `mount -t 9p ...` then what is wrong with referring to > it as 9pfs ? perhaps there is a problem with the way '9p' is used in the > linux impl. > > Uriel wrote: >> >> Uhu? I think you are confused, see http://9p.cat-v.org/implementations and >> /faq >> >> 9P2000 is the latest version of the protocol, used by pretty much >> everyone using 9P. >> >> The linux kernel implementation is called v9fs. >> >> uriel >> >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Robert C Corsaro <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Uriel wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Michael Stapelberg >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Kris, >>>>> >>>>> * [30.01.09 03:46]: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You're right, libixp should certainly not try to call methods that >>>>>> aren't >>>>>> implemented. But, you haven't attached a patch. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm sorry, it's getting late ;-). Find the patch attached now. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 3) When writing "Fullscreen toggle" to /client/sel/ctl, something >>>>>>> (probably >>>>>>> 9pfs) produces a hard-lockup (sound freezes, X11 freezes, nothing >>>>>>> possible >>>>>>> no more, just reboot). This may be related to 2). I'm not sure how >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> further debug this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't know how wmii could cause this. It could certainly freeze X11, >>>>>> and so probably any badly written audio player (e.g., xmms), but >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm using cmus, which does not seem to be written so badly ;-). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> certainly not lock up your computer. Can you ssh in? Are you using >>>>>> 9pfs? >>>>>> That *could* certainly lock up your computer, but it shouldn't. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> SSHing in is not possible. Yes, I'm using 9pfs. I think it could be >>>>> wstat >>>>> not >>>>> being implemented or something like this causing an endless loop in >>>>> 9pfs >>>>> or similar? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> What is 9pfs? You mean v9fs? If so, *sigh* >>>> >>>> uriel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> The linux impl is called 9p2000 and type is 9p when mounting :P >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > >
It's just about terminology. don't call it 9pfs.
