Andy noted..
>
> From: Stephen Farrell
>>
>> So in addition, I was hoping this group would document use-cases and
>> requirements for new protocols or changes to current protocols if the wg
>> figure some are needed so that we could spin-up short-lived SEC or other
>> WGs as needed.
>
> I view this sort of like I view Zalewski's browser security handbook
> (http://code.google.com/p/browsersec/wiki/Main).
>
> Anywhere we document a behavior using a chart or some such and the behavior
> differs, or we can't point to an underlying spec that allows for the
> variance, we should seriously consider spinning up some standards work, and
> hope that we can get everyone to adopt.
>
> I don't think this is a misplaced hope/plan at all :)
+1
Additionally, I was about to point to the browser security handbook (BSH) as
perhaps an example of what sort of document(s) wpkops will craft for web pki --
one(s) featuring tables with rows denoting features/behavior and columns
denoting implementations. Different tables address different topics.
https://code.google.com/p/browsersec/wiki/Part2
=JeffH
_______________________________________________
wpkops mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
