On 08/28/2012 11:35 PM, Tom Ritter wrote:
> We're not scared talking about Browser Security features. And we're > not talking about _vulnerabilities_ in hardware devices that would be > difficult to patch and leave people vulnerable... It's just everyone > seems to clam up when it comes time to say who actually can't support > compression or whatever. I know no one is actually trying to > perpetuate some sort of coverup - but at the same time *believing* > that there's no nefarious purpose and still not seeing any info is > pretty frustrating. I'm sure there're ways to handle this. And since we're talking about an OPS area WG, other WGs will have figured out ways and means. I've asked a couple of folks, since I don't know myself. Cheers, S. > > -tom > _______________________________________________ > wpkops mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops > > _______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
