> On 23/05/2004, at 11:37 PM, noa wrote: > Does 'CSS-Discuss' consider validation a theoretical issue?
While I dislike all this "meta" discussion - in my opinion, if you don't like the format of the list, there are plenty of other resources available in alternative formats, so you'd be better investigating the other options than clogging the list with off-topic meta discussion - I have to chime in here. css-discuss is a great list, but it is insanely high volume and if you think this list is strict, wait til you see the responses to off-topic posts there. Thanks Russ and Peter, this is a great resource, and I'm going to shut up now. -- Kay Smoljak http://developer.perthweb.com.au ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************
