> What is the most semantic way to markup an interview? I've been thinking about this a bit.
If I did want to find the _most semantic_ way to markup an interview (I can't imagine thinking about it if we hadn't been discussing it though ;-), why wouldn't a paragraph with a meaningful class be the best solution (such as the speaker or whether it's a question or answer)? I mean, a definition list is really for definitions, and headings are really meant for, well, headings. Given that there is no element in XHTML specifically for interview questions and answers, a paragraph is the most applicable element that is still semantically (meaningfully) correct - we just want to give it a bit more meaning with some well-chosen classes. For example, a paragraph could simply be given a class corresponding to the person speaking (class="interviewee" or class="DarrinHinch") or even two classes to be more meaningful (class="interviewer statement" or class="interviewer question" (aside: i've seen this in XML but not sure if two values for a class is actually correct in XHTML?)) Anyway, that being said, not sure that it matters too much :-) ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
