Al Sparber wrote:
I do agree that English is a crazy language - but that's as far as I go
:-) The gent from Harvard provide the link to the W3C's definition of
"should", which seems to jive with mine. As for a standards-based page,
agreeing that it is not a hard and fast rule that tables be banned for
layout, can you present some logical arguments against this page -
keeping strictly within the context of standards:
http://www.projectseven.com/csslab/zealotry/linear_basics.htm
Well, I don't think you can argue against it Al.
The use of Bowie is a masterstroke. If you look at his various "guises"
- vis: the thin white duke, aladdin sane, the young americans, his
"berlin" period, for example - quite clearly they are "thematic
implementations" of Bowie qua Bowie. How he's handled the "ownership
issues" is a model of simultaneously working within, and subverting, the
dominant capitalist paradigm. The importance of this, as you say,
"cannot be understated".
Well done on presenting a complex notion so concisely.
Mike
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
