I agree, do it the old school way with inline styles.

If you really can't stand the idea of going back to tables I remember using absolutely positioned divs (declared inline) for block positioning. There may be some overlapping with font resizing. But given the brief, you're going to have to sacrifice a lot and tell very few people about it.

Seb


On 13 Jun 2007, at 06:13, Jermayn Parker wrote:

from just reading the points been raised, I would suggest just do old fashion html with inline styling, tables etc



On 6/13/07, Michael MD < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My initial tests show that NN4.03 handles some CSS (float, background, > border, font etc) but not some important things (list-style, margin and > padding on lists). Is there a source for information about CSS support on
> old browsers?

if you are going to use css with netscape 4 I suggest you do lots of testing ... it's buggy as hell on that browser... and errors often cause the content
not to be displayed at all! - I'd probably go for just basic html for
netscape 4...

In fact it was Nestcape 4 that scared me off from using CSS for a few years!




*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************




--
JP2 Designs
http://www.jp2designs.com

http://www.germworks.net
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************



*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to