Hi, I'd still include the link (as the first link on the page) as I imagine you're still going to have other browser content before you get to your page's main content (headers, logos etc.) -- unless you want users of screenreaders to have to sit through that for every page.
I'd say anything that adds to the usability of a site for any group is worth including. Also, it's very easy to hide these links from other "standard" browsers if you so wish, so it's not really much of an overhead to include them. Hope this helps, David On 28/06/07, Frank Palinkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All, Just a quick question and please pardon my ignorance.. If the global site navigation on a page is marked up below the content, and then floated left (or right) to bring it visually next to the content in a two column manner, is it good practice to include a "Skip to Content" link as part of the navigation markup for users with assistive technologies? More simply put, given that the global nav is structurally situated below the content, will this preclude the use of a skip to content link? Looking forward to your comments, Kind regards, Frank ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
-- David Little -m: 077 6596 5655 -e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -w: www.littled.net ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
