Hi All, >From the feedback and very reasonable/realistic points made, I'm going to make sure that _all_ users will be able to deal with the navigation in a manner that will suit them (visible and off screen). I don't consider this a redundancy, but as professionally catering to whoever may open the page regardless of their physical condition.
Thank you all for your learned comments and help. It's much appreciated. Kind regards, Frank -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Little Sent: Thursday, 28 June, 2007 12:33 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Skip to Content? > On 28 Jun 2007, at 6:50 PM, Frank Palinkas wrote: > > > If the global site navigation on a page is marked up below the > > content... > > Hang on - if your nav is *below* the content, wouldn't the link be > better as 'skip to navigation'? I think in this case it would be a good idea to have both links, e.g. something like: <div class="skip"> <a href="#content">Skip to content</a> | <a href="#navigation">Skip to navigation</a> </div> Hiding the links as suggested via positioning. David -- David Little -e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -w: www.littled.net ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
