|
Forgot to clarify one thing: ECMAScript is fully OO
in my opinion, however _javascript_ is not a full implementation of
ECMAScript, unfortunately. Thanks, Anthony. Brett Patterson wrote: I didn't see that. :) But as I have read in other areas, _javascript_ is based on ECMAScript. And Object-oriented programming (OOP) is a programming paradigm that uses "objects" and their interactions to design applications and computer programs. Is this correct? ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* |
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Anthony Ziebell
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please liorean
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please liorean
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Anthony Ziebell
- RE: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Kekay Olvera
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Nick Tomczek
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Brett Patterson
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Hassan Schroeder
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Brett Patterson
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Anthony Ziebell
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Anthony Ziebell
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Brett Patterson
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Anthony Ziebell
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Luke Hoggett
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Brett Patterson
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please liorean
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Anthony Ziebell
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Breton Slivka
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Anthony Ziebell
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Brett Patterson
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please liorean
