|
You can call it whatever you like, I am / was just
trying to answer your question, based on my experiences and perceptions. Cheers, Anthony. Brett Patterson wrote: Well, I read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototype-based_programming and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-based_languages , and I see your points. But, for arguments sake, let's say it is not prototype-based. Would it be object-oriented, like Java or C++, or object-based? ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* |
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please liorean
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Anthony Ziebell
- RE: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Kekay Olvera
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Nick Tomczek
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Brett Patterson
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Hassan Schroeder
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Brett Patterson
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Anthony Ziebell
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Anthony Ziebell
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Brett Patterson
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Anthony Ziebell
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Luke Hoggett
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Brett Patterson
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please liorean
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Anthony Ziebell
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Breton Slivka
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Anthony Ziebell
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Brett Patterson
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please liorean
- Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please Simon Josephson
- [WSG] Span within a "li" Simon Josephson
