> 2008/10/24 Anthony Ziebell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Forgot to clarify one thing: ECMAScript is fully OO in my opinion, however > JavaScript is not a full implementation of ECMAScript, unfortunately.
> liorean wrote: > JavaScript is a superset of ECMAScript. If ECMAScript is opbject > oriented, so is JavaScript. 2008/10/24 Anthony Ziebell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > A 'superset' of ECMA3 which is not fully compliant. Right... Every language has it's implementation holes where the spec and implementations disagree. However, JavaScript as implemented in the SpiderMonkey engine is in fact a full implementation of ECMAScript except for a few mostly minor fringe issues (most of them bugs, a few of them spec bugs, some reality-trumps-specification issues). So are Futhark, JavaScriptCore and V8 also. JScript is a bit further off, but it's not extremely far off. Go on, try to find a pure ECMAScript feature that is not implemented in mentioned engines. There are a few, but I bet you'll have to try pretty many things before you find one. And none of them are about a whole major feature being broken. -- David "liorean" Andersson ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
