Thanks Edward You have been a very good help to me, I will try to be as accurate in my magazine as possible and that is why I am asking for help (I will pass pdf's of the magazine as it goes along the production stage for all you guys to have a look if you like and let me know).
I would appreciate any ideas, what would you like from a magazine. I am trying to include good informative articles on current issues with browser compatibility as well as the focus on css3 when it is released full with browsers that fully support this function. So any ideas you or anyone else has on what you would like please let me know. If you have any issues regarding this email please feel free to contact me on the details below. Aaron Wheeler Tel: 01483 860 235 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.stageguy.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Clarke Sent: 25 October 2008 21:00 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] Writing authoritative content I don't doubt your intentions, the more useful resources there are the more the standards are raised but people will "interpret" / "get led by" / "take as gospel" information they receive when the source of the information is, in their eyes, authoritative. With this comes a responsibility to be factually accurate and be of unquestionable quality. Just look at the UK's current education system for the results of poor teaching, economically unproductive numpties who struggle to spell correctly. I wouldn't worry too much about arguments, let it fall on deaf ears, but do heed knowledge and experience from seasoned coders here, after all, it's something you'll be expecting your readership to do ;) WSG is a very productive list for students of standards so you're definitely in the right place. I wish your magazine every success. Regards, Edward Clarke www.ebizconsultancy.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Wheeler Sent: 25 October 2008 20:40 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] Writing authoritative content Edward Sorry but to elaborate further, I found this problem to with so many people offering the true compliant ways to code and not performing and once again blaming the web for their mistakes. I would like to point out this is why I have turned to this site as a means to help out on my magazine to make sure all stuff is compliant. I was going to send an email next saying any articles that are made for my magazine if they were posted in these emails. If when people got a chance could please read and confirm all this. I do not mean to upset people and start arguments which some people would seem want to I just want a magazine that is easy to follow and keeps us to a line with compliant standards. If you have any issues regarding this email please feel free to contact me on the details below. Aaron Wheeler Tel: 01483 860 235 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.stageguy.co.uk ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.2/1742 - Release Date: 25/10/2008 09:53 ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
