Thank you for saying that, Elizabeth, couldn't agree more about both frames and Flash...
I strongly recommend customers against fully-flash sites due to the inconsistent (compared to web conventions), usually non-spiderable, and inaccessible navigation, but agree it can be useful for specific web-apps (wrapped in suitable HTML navigation, etc.) and some nice branding-related effects... but generally, Flash is overused when HTML + CSS with a sprinkling of Javascript could do the job better and in accordance with web standards. Regards, Dave Elizabeth Spiegel wrote: > Hi Kate > > > > You said: “do need to study how frames work (naming) too.” > > > > Nononono! > > > > Frames are awful for accessibility and usability (iFrames are arguably > better). I can’t think of an example of a really good framed site > (although other list members may be able to offer some). > > > > I used to say the same of Flash, but did eventually find some sites > demonstrating really clever and appropriate uses for it. > > > > > > *Elizabeth Spiegel* > > *Web editing* > > *0409 986 158* > > *GPO Box 729, Hobart TAS 7001* > > *www.spiegelweb.com.au* > > > > > > > > > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* -- Dave Lane = Egressive Ltd = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = m: +64 21 229 8147 p: +64 3 9633733 = Linux: it just tastes better = nosoftwarepatents http://egressive.com ==== we only use open standards: http://w3.org Effusion Group Founding Member =========== http://effusiongroup.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
