Sorry to see that you have been also spammed by some jerk. I have received 11 e-mails spam from
different people who were contacted by the same "Group". Some person, if one would call them that has done it to us all. I have another word for them. Spammers. It is unfortunate that some people have nothing constructive to do with their lives except raise hell. I sent a question to a forum at Web Standards Group but I am not Christian nor is that related to my question. Houstin -----Original Message----- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of c...@fagandesign.com.au Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 5:53 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation Quoting Nick Stone <boa...@nick-stone.com>: > Christian, > > You said you've been told to place IE specific rules in a separate > sheet, but you don't mention why you haven't done so. > Would that work? If so, please explain your reasons for not doing so. > C) facilitates site maintenance (easy to find and modify IE specific rules) Thanks for the feedback Nick. I guess it's a personal preference to have the IE specific declarations right next to the original/good browser ones....I find it's far easier to debug rather than having a seperate IE stylesheet. This is the way I've done it for ages now and until now, haven't run into any problems. ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
