Sorry to see that you have been also spammed by some jerk. I have received 11 e-mails spam from
different people who were contacted by the same "Group". Some person, if one would call them that has done it to us all. I have another word for them. Spammers. It is unfortunate that some people have nothing constructive to do with their lives except raise hell. I sent a question to a forum at Web Standards Group but I am not Christian nor is that related to my question. Houstin -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thierry Koblentz Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 3:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [WSG] AAA Accessibility and validation > Nick > Zoom:1 is not bad enough to warrant a conditional comment and separate style sheet. > It's a valid rule that basically says show the screen at 100%. A user style sheet > can still over-ride this rule. It's an easy way to add hasLayout without causing > other issues. > This is what Microsoft recommended when they introduced IE7 and there's not a strong reason to avoid it. Another way to trigger hasLayout in IE7 without failing validation is to use min/max-height or min/max-height. But I agree, zoom's perfect for those who don't care for CSS validation (does not work in IE5 though). -- Regards, Thierry | www.tjkdesign.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [email protected] ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [email protected] *******************************************************************
