On 10/06/2016 16:42, Black Michael wrote:
The remaining question is the inconsistency...whether or not one has a
working freq for a mode doesn't seem like it should change the
behavior...quite non-intuitive.
Either all mode changes do it or none do it. That seems logical to me.
So it's either monitor=true in mode change or delete the one in freq
change, isn't it? Either would make it consistent.
Hi Mike,
it's not the mode change that causes monitor to turn on, it's the
frequency change that gets invoked automatically when the mode change
finds a working frequency available. That's no more inconsistent than,
for example, being able to drive your car after you turn the key (press
the button), or not if there is no fuel/charge available.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity
planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
