Hi Folks, Decoder sensitivity, radio splits, mitigation attempts... all great but it is not the issue I am raising for research .... On clear bandwidth the protocol has no issues...
There are some comments on forums – English and otherwise. Thank you Google Translate. I have run a few “sims” under congestion on-air and via complex “predictors”... and performance under congestion is the issue that I am seeking a bit of comment for and potential investigation of. As stated I have some observations that I lack empirical evidence for at this stage. This is VERY useful feedback for Joe and Bill. 73 Stev I Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 ________________________________ From: Scott Brown <kd4...@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:21:29 AM To: M Lewton; WSJT software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] v2.0 RC4 in congestion ! Settings > Radio > Split Operation > Check Fake It. This seems to do the trick. Just a bandaid tho. Centering up the dial seems more feasible. 😊 -Scott KD4YDD ________________________________ From: M Lewton <mplew...@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 4:50 PM To: WSJT software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] v2.0 RC4 in congestion ! I agree. A few of operators operating above 2000 have a good signal on the waterfall, I copy them well but they can't seem to hear me ?? I am running 100 watts using a IC-7300 with BW set to 3600. It seem that they are running a KW to my 100 watts. You are right, with some receivers it would be better to set the Freq. to 14.075 instead of 14.074 etc. using rc8 until the next release. I am happy with the sensitivity of the decoder though. Maurice WA6PHR -----Original Message----- From: Mark James Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 5:59 AM To: WSJT software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] v2.0 RC4 in congestion ! If you are working above 2000, and might have performance issues on receiving signals there, another option is to use a higher dial frequency -- eg 7.075 or 7.076. This doesn't affect the actual frequencies used, just may make it easier to manage. On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 7:52 AM John Nelson <j...@rmnjmn.co.uk> wrote: Steve, > one must “adjust” the AF “Power” drive control as one shifts Tx > frequency. Are you not using CAT control with “Split” selected? If so, VFOB is set such that the audio tone generated is always between 1500 and 2000 Hz which should always be within the SSB passband. The TX offset is managed by VFOB. — John G4KLA_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.sourceforge.net%2Flists%2Flistinfo%2Fwsjt-devel&data=02%7C01%7C%7C44e62dccb4654c0a941f08d64ef0fbbb%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636783194249833574&sdata=QLaeCUIjDS9knkwwVaO4%2BEkhYN6Kx9SiaL3OynpeWzI%3D&reserved=0 _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
