Thanks for the kind words Scott. I have “arranged” a little internet.... WiFi systems are quite insecure 😉
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 ________________________________ From: Scott Brown <kd4...@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:06:56 AM To: WSJT software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] v2.0 RC4 in congestion ! Good luck on your surgery Steve! -Scott KD4YDD On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:19 PM, Stephen Ireland <vk3...@hotmail.com<mailto:vk3...@hotmail.com>> wrote: Mark, I had considered this and its a fair suggestion – but the start of our band is say 7.074. Are we not best working under real world congestion – especially on 40m - and not closed-conditions? That is why I raised the Fleishman and Pons “Cold Fusion” fiasco – an example that runs shivers down the spine of anyone trying to research or develop – in the initial post... John, No split selected. Please do not take this the wrong way but I cannot see how split is relevant to this discussion 😊. Splits are a fantastic idea – but by far the vast majority of FT8 conduct Tx’s with the extensive split functionality disabled my observation; An op selects a frequency and stays there. An op responds either directly on the calling Op’s offset OR at their own selected frequency. Splits CAN be a nightmare for the unwary ! 73, its 5am here ... and off for surgery so I be quiet for a few days ... maybe ! Steve I Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 ________________________________ From: Mark James <markhjame...@gmail.com<mailto:markhjame...@gmail.com>> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 12:59:00 AM To: WSJT software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] v2.0 RC4 in congestion ! If you are working above 2000, and might have performance issues on receiving signals there, another option is to use a higher dial frequency -- eg 7.075 or 7.076. This doesn't affect the actual frequencies used, just may make it easier to manage. On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 7:52 AM John Nelson <j...@rmnjmn.co.uk<mailto:j...@rmnjmn.co.uk>> wrote: Steve, > one must “adjust” the AF “Power” drive control as one shifts Tx frequency. Are you not using CAT control with “Split” selected? If so, VFOB is set such that the audio tone generated is always between 1500 and 2000 Hz which should always be within the SSB passband. The TX offset is managed by VFOB. — John G4KLA_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
