Looking forward to. Forgive my spelling.

De OH6VDA

> 29. nov. 2018 kl. 14:07 skrev Tom Ramberg <oh6...@yahoo.com>:
> 
> In a couple of days, when RC1, 2 and 3 stop working, and only RC4 and RC5 
> works, hopefully this situation where a lot decode 77 bit messages but do not 
> respond will stop. Lokking forward to a comlete 77 bit universe.
> 
> Tom, OH6VDA
> 
> Sendt fra min iPad Air 2
> 
>> 29. nov. 2018 kl. 03:30 skrev Chuck Furman <chuck.fur...@gmail.com>:
>> 
>> I’m confused. Why is CQ 77 helpful?  Only people who are already on 77 bit 
>> mode will decode you. Am I missing something? I am just curious. It seem 
>> more useful to TX on 75 bits with something like “PSE USE 77BIT”
>> 
>>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 7:23 PM Al Pawlowski <k6...@almont.com> wrote:
>>> I have used “CQ 77 …..” a few times for the same thing and it is not very 
>>> sticky also. In fact, even saved free text messages revert to the standard 
>>> after any attempt to answer a call.
>>> 
>>> In addition, it appears double-clicking a received message with <CQ_XXX>, 
>>> which is what other non-standard CQ messages I’ve seen decode as (probably 
>>> my 77 also, will not initiate a return/answer sequence on double click - 
>>> you have to start one manually (type callsign, generate messages, select 
>>> TX1, enable tx). So, I only send a couple of the CQ 77 messages and 
>>> followed by a standard CQ, or CQ DX.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
>>> Los Osos, CA USA
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:36:29 +1300
>>>> From: "Gary Hinson" <g...@isect.com>
>>>> To: "'WSJT software development'" <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>> Subject: [wsjt-devel] 2 more bug reports on RC5
>>>> 
>>>> ………. I've tried sending "CQ PLUS ZL2IFB RF80" and
>>>> little free text messages to give more of a clue that I'm using the new 77
>>>> bit version . but I've noticed that the "PLUS" in my CQ message is not very
>>>> sticky………….
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>>> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to