HI Al.

 

As I understand it, the zero to 4 characters we can insert into a standard CQ 
message must be letters only – no numbers – if the recipients are to be able to 
double-click and respond to them.  That’s why I’m using “CQ PLUS”.  It’s a 
limitation of the message compression – not enough bits to code letters AND 
numbers in that field.  If we use numbers, the message changes to a normal 
free-text message format … with no indication to the user that it is 
unclickable at the far end …

 

Yes, the disappearing custom 73 messages can be a bit annoying at times.  Also, 
it would be nice if clicking the ‘Generate std messages’ button re-generated 
the complete set of standard messages on demand, for those occasions when we 
mess up our custom messages, typing ineptly against the clock!

73
Gary  ZL2iFB

 

From: Al Pawlowski <k6...@almont.com> 
Sent: 29 November 2018 14:19
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] 2 more bug reports on RC5

 

I have used “CQ 77 …..” a few times for the same thing and it is not very 
sticky also. In fact, even saved free text messages revert to the standard 
after any attempt to answer a call.

 

In addition, it appears double-clicking a received message with <CQ_XXX>, which 
is what other non-standard CQ messages I’ve seen decode as (probably my 77 
also, will not initiate a return/answer sequence on double click - you have to 
start one manually (type callsign, generate messages, select TX1, enable tx). 
So, I only send a couple of the CQ 77 messages and followed by a standard CQ, 
or CQ DX.

 

 

Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA



Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:36:29 +1300

From: "Gary Hinson" < <mailto:g...@isect.com> g...@isect.com>
To: "'WSJT software development'" < <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> 
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [wsjt-devel] 2 more bug reports on RC5

………. I've tried sending "CQ PLUS ZL2IFB RF80" and
little free text messages to give more of a clue that I'm using the new 77
bit version . but I've noticed that the "PLUS" in my CQ message is not very
sticky………….

 

_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to