FWIW I have always used JT9+JT65 as opposed to plain JT65 mode. Why would one not?
73 -Jim NU0C On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:59:49 -0500 Joe Taylor <j...@princeton.edu> wrote: > We will probably do away with JT9+JT65 mode, some time soon. It is no > longer useful, and it complicated the code in a number of ways. -- "I aim to misbehave." - Captain Malcolm Reynolds, "Serenity" _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel