Bill, > you stated the above, that is indirect evidence that you have distributed a > binary version of WSJT-X.
Indirect evidence - hmmmm ... Assumptions. Reminds me of Fleishman, Pons and their "Cold Fusion" ... Fact: The reference to the 891 refers to equipment at an alternate site listed on my licence. Fact: GNU GPLv3 has not been violated after conferring with a solicitor. Qualified facts here. Binary distros of your code are flying everywhere; people are DESPERATE to overcome this debacle with changes forced onto Hamlib by the premature 2.2.0 release. Faulty releases are still being distributed without warning hence unanswered posts on the Dev forum. Back to the opening comment - you assumed - wrongly - and pursued with green-eyed venom. You targeted someone (as is not uncommon in this place) - me in this case - and wrongly. The behaviours demonstrated are so mixed around here ! As recent examples, some get lauded for posting "false decodes" - yet I got derided the other day. Variable and selective behaviours ... This is what is killing AR. People here as leaders should be consistent, respectful and hence setting way better examples. Comments to Mike Black - one of AR's real geniuses - are also observed by many to be substandard .... Stop it ! Behave ! Think about how you are interacting with the community here ! It is not about ego - it is about growth and future ! You cannot have your cake and eat it too - a Famous Aussie expression. Grow up gentlemen. Play nicely with the kiddies. Teach, develop and nurture the kiddies. Otherwise the playground will get ripped apart ! Don't respond further to this in public as it only divides AR down further. I have only responded here as quite a number of emails have come in from many too "scared" to express concerns. Steve I VK3VM / VK3SIR _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
