Mike,

Did you checked what happens in your computer(s) in following combinations:

15 s wav, Flatten, Low sidelobes 

15 s wav, Flatten, Most sensitive

15 s wav, non-flatten, Low sidelobes

15 s wav, non-flatten, Most sensitive

45 s wav, Flatten, Low sidelobes 

45 s wav, Flatten, Most sensitive

45 s wav, non-flatten, Low sidelobes

45 s wav, non-flatten, Most sensitive

 

Only one but last one generated those multitude sidelobes in mine! For sure it 
is not clipping at top of amplitude. Clipping would generate harmonics not 
sidelobes. Could it be a spectrum calculation overflow in the Low sidelopes 
process?

 

Mike have your made a over the air measurement where you have guaranteed that 
no “clipping” happens at receiver system? My thermometer goes to 84 % with your 
*.wav files.

 

I fully agree Bill that most transmitters have other noise components higher 
than those.

 

73, Reino OH3mA

 

From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com] 
Sent: 15. helmikuuta 2021 15:32
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Clipping

 

Mike,

 

the "nastiness" you refer to is more than 65 dB down. As far as we have been 
able to determine it is due to either Windows or VAC. My money is on Windows 
since VB Cable exhibits the same behaviour, although that is not conclusive. 
Note that 65 dB down is below the distortion added by almost all transmitters. 
We are pretty certain Qt is not the cause since when the Pwr slider is at 0dB 
Qt does nothing with the samples other than copy them to the Windows MME audio 
buffers.

 

73
Bill
G4WJS.

 

On 15/02/2021 13:23, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:

It's not just the waterfall....that nastiness gets transmitted too.

 

Mike W9MDB

 

 

 

 

On Monday, February 15, 2021, 02:53:44 AM CST, Reino Talarmo  
<mailto:reino.tala...@kolumbus.fi> <reino.tala...@kolumbus.fi> wrote: 

 

 

Hi Mike and Bill,

I looked those *.wav files using v2.4.0-rc1 and noted interesting presentation 
difference, when I had Flatten activated or non-activated. Especially the 
waterfall display changed a lot. It was difficult to see those multiple 
sidebands in non-flatten display totally independent of gain and zero settings. 
In spectrum display I can see the carrier and weak sidebands at 310 Hz or so. 
In both flattened and non-flattened spectrum other than the 310 Hz sidebands 
are really weak some are just a pixel or two and others none.
Could the flattening do more than modify the frequency amplitude and be an 
additional reason for a bad waterfall display?

73, Reino OH3mA

 

_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to