Thanks for that info, Bill. So, if I work a R1 station in CM, the contact is not valid for him? That’s very unfortunate.
Still, could the option be applied for R2 and R3? Seems like we could build it into a configuration somehow? George J Molnar College Park, Maryland KF2T | FM19ma > On Aug 1, 2021, at 12:59 PM, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel > <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > On 01/08/2021 16:44, George J Molnar via wsjt-devel wrote: >> Submitted for discussion… >> >> Would it make sense to make the default sequence for VHF+ operation the >> “Contest Mode” style with no signal reports, no “CQ TEST” and no contest log >> being generated? Good old-fashioned Grids-Only mode. We don’t need signal >> reports on weak signal or Es VHF work, where the intent is to have a valid >> contact in minimum time. >> >> We can probably eliminate the “VHF and above” features checkbox, too. There >> does seem to be confusion around it, sometimes. Just have the application >> default to VHF settings, grids only, above 29.700 MHz. If “Special >> Activity” is selected, then the appropriate TEST message can be generated >> along with opening a Cabrillo log. >> >> I’m not advocating changing the below-50 MHz setting, since I think the >> howls would be large and sustained. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> George J Molnar, KF2T >> College Park, Maryland, USA > George, > > that is a non-starter in Region 1 at least since the Region 1 VHF handbook > defines a QSO to include a piece of QSO specific information being exchanged > and confirmed. A grid square does not meet that criteria. OTOH the grid > square is not required by that definition of a QSO. > > 73 > Bill > G4WJS. > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
