As a very active CW operator, I view this as a VERY BAD move. The presence of FT4 in that region is a most unwelcome intrusion. I view it as the only major bad judgement call by the WSJT team.

73, Jim K9YC

On 12/26/2021 7:44 PM, Tsutsumi Takehiko via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi,

ARRL Letter on 09/23/2021 titled “IARU Regio 3 Considers Significant Expansion of HF Digital Segments” triggered the dialog among JA WSJT users about the recent activities of IARU bandplan proposal. It is the great movement establishing “time-synchronized transmission mode capacity demands” and we must encourage globally harmonized bandplan implementation as soon as possible. However, I noticed a  concern on 40m  proposal by the reason that I have experienced a lots of QRM from lengthy, high powered and wide band occupied adjacent  SSB operation on 40m at QRG 7074 FT-8 activity and it is not the best allocation for all narrow band data users as FT-8 is the most favorite and popular format today.  From this aspect, I prefer FT-8 to take the most protected segment from SSB operation swapping the allocation of Time Sync Data to 7040~7055kHz, for example 7040kHz. This principle to allocate lower side to “Time Synch Data” is proposed on 80m. I understand the allocation rule to prioritize the current allocation explained in the letter saying “ a global narrowband conversational modes (e.g., PSK) segment between 7040 and 7044 kHz in alignment with existing Region 1 arrangements” but that is not future looking and does not convince for me.

Thus, I wish to hear from the audience of this forum whether it is painful enough for us to move WSJT i.e. FT-8  segment to 7040~7055kHz and I must refrain from proposing to IARU R3 at this moment.

Any comments (from Region 1 especially) ?

Regards,

take

de JA5AEA

Windows のメール <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> から送信



_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel



_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to