Yes, that is perfectly clear and needs no further 'discussion'.
73
Conrad PA5Y
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Monday, May 8, 2023 8:34 PM
To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Joe Taylor <j...@princeton.edu>
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Enough
Please, folks, no more email about "Split".
Multiple messages on the same topic by the same few individuals are seldom
helpful -- and in my view most certainly have not been, in this instance.
Regarding terminology used in the WSJT-X user interface: English and most other
modern languages often use the same work to mean somewhat different things in
different contexts. In the present case, "Split Operation" is clearly defined
when first used in the WSJT-X User Guide.
Here's the full entry, quoted from near the end of Section 4.2:
"Split Operation: Significant advantages result from using Split mode (separate
VFOs for Rx and Tx) if your radio supports it. If it does not, WSJT-X can
emulate such behavior. Either method will result in a cleaner transmitted
signal, by keeping the Tx audio always in the range 1500 to
2000 Hz so that audio harmonics cannot pass through the Tx sideband filter.
Select Rig to use the radio’s Split mode, or Fake It to have WSJT-X adjust the
VFO frequency as needed, when T/R switching occurs.
Choose None if you do not wish to use split operation."
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
