>
> Wow! If this works, Conal might be pleased.
>
Yes, indeed! I've been blocked in my high-level GUIs & graphics work for a
few years, while waiting for a low-level (imperative) Haskell library to
show up that combines GUIs & graphics, works cross-platform (including
native graphics on Mac), and supports incremental development. gtk2hs
almost got there recently, but not quite, and I've always preferred
wxHaskell's API.
- Conal
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Dave Tapley <dave.a.tap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4 January 2012 18:23, Eric Kow <eric....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 4 Jan 2012, at 16:59, Dave Tapley wrote:
>> > Also, I imagine that while this brings us closer to wxHaskell in GHCi,
>> we would still need to solve the second start crash?
>> >
>> >
>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1610984&group_id=7the3133&atid=536845
>> >
>> > Well, I just had a look, and that issue seems to have gone away in my
>> darcsden branch!
>> > I've added a comment to the tracker.
>> >
>>
>> Wow! If this works, Conal might be pleased.
>>
>
> It certainly seems to, insomuch as the given test code no longer causes a
> crash :)
>
>
>>
>> By the way, you mentioned wx-config (I get the feeling you'd asked me a
>> direct question and I forgot to answer). Did you have a look at the
>> Haskell code in our repo which provides a wx-config replacement? The
>> replacement is very very stupid and needs generalising, but it might be
>> easier to bring it closer to the kind of completeness we need than to
>> maintain the C++ one.
>>
>
> Ah, yes, I suspected this would need some debate.
> I was on the cusp of merging in your wx-config implementation, namely:
> http://darcsden.com/kowey/wxhaskell/browse/wx-config/
>
> But then I got a reply from the previous project leader wx-config-win:
> http://code.google.com/p/wx-config-win/
>
> He had hoped that one day wx-config-win might be merged in to wxWidgets,
> but noted that it had fallen behind the project and had several known
> issues:
> http://code.google.com/p/wx-config-win/issues/list
>
> Personally I feel that (for similar arguments to those for maintaining wxC
> as a language-agnostic project) we should pursue wx-config-win. Thoughts?
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Eric Kow <http://erickow.com>
>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAk8EmT4ACgkQBUrOwgisBPnz/wCdEapNshQh+ZqEh2SyyXi/uXO9
>> 5lcAnRymzM7qQnzru6cdKpoTqZZ3kQM4
>> =hcbP
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
wxhaskell-devel mailing list
wxhaskell-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel
