Hi Shelarcy, Is this something you know what to do with? Perhaps the non-VS build should be the default?
Thanks! On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 09:35:33 +0100, Claus Reinke wrote: > "Claus Reinke" <claus.rei...@talk21.com> wrote in message > news:h103ak$ae...@ger.gmane.org... > >I tried updating some old wxHaskell code to work with recent > > ghc/wxHaskell. On a windows xp system, I have installed the > > ghc-6.10.3 and wxhaskell-bin-msw2.8.10-ghc6.10.3-0.11.1.2-0 > > binary installers. After compiling my code, I can't run the executables, > > due to missing dependencies (copied from event viewer): > > > > Dependent Assembly Microsoft.VC90.CRT could not be found > > and Last Error was The referenced assembly is not installed on your > > system. ... > > This has come up before, and the advice has been to install extra bits > > of Visual Studio. However, the latest recommended version of these > > files clearly states that they may only be used with a valid Visual Studio > > license: > > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=A5C84275-3B97-4AB7-A40D-3802B2AF5FC2&displaylang=en > > > > So that is a no-go. As I understand the VS deployment models, VS > > distinguishes between components that may be redistributed and those > > that may not. wxHaskell should only depend on the former, and should > > include them in the binary installer, because the kind person building > > wxHaskell via VS is the only one who can include those redistributable > > dependencies. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ wxhaskell-users mailing list wxhaskell-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users
