On Jan 17, 2008 12:53 PM, Ryan Pusztai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2008 12:15 PM, Leslie Newell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks John,
> >
> > It now works fine. By the way, do you have any intention of supporting a
> > monolithic wxLua build?
>
> Please! Please! Please! I am developing a Premake script to do this, but it
> would be much better in the build system you prefer.

Ok, one thing at a time, but I think we almost have everything else
working, but we'll only know that when people try it.

For the monolithic build:

How do you envision it? A single shared library with wxLua and all the
bindings? I assume this is so that wx.so/dll is just a single file.
Or?

Note: The wxLua libraries were separated since wxPython (for good or
bad) separates them, but goes even further by making you import each
library and even classes, "import wx; import wx.lib.docview" for
example.

Would wxLua like to have to have in addition to wx.so, wxlua.so,
wxlua_base.so, wxlua_core.so, wxlua_xxx so you can "require" only the
bits you really want.

Regards,
    John

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
wxlua-users mailing list
wxlua-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users

Reply via email to