On Jan 17, 2008 1:27 PM, Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 13:21 -0500, John Labenski wrote:
>
> > For the monolithic build:
> >
> > How do you envision it?
>
> I'd like to see just one DSO containing all the bindings that you can
> just do 'require "wx"' from inside a standard Lua interpreter. Just one
> file you can put along side. (Excluding the WxWidgets DSOs themselves,
> obviously: although I suppose the bindings could statically link to them
> too, although that's not an option for me as Ubuntu doesn't come with
> static versions, but that's outside your control.)
So only wxLua's wx.so is monolithic. Ok, sounds fine.
> Additionally, is there a way of detecting which features a specific
> build of the Wx bindings has from Lua?
Yes, you have access to all the binding information, classes, their
member functions and the parameters they take, everything. See
binding.wx.lua and wxlua.i in wxluaref.html.
Regards,
John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
wxlua-users mailing list
wxlua-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users
