On Jan 21, 2008 9:24 AM, Ryan Pusztai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 21, 2008 8:46 AM, Leslie Newell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > By the way, might
> > it be better to call it wxlua.dll instead of wx.dll?
> >
>
> Well the way that Lua "require()" works would make it so that you need to
> require wxLua and then I think the wx.xxx won't work anymore.
Right, require("wx") looks for the shared library wx.so/dll, a
function called "int luaopen_wx(lua_State *L)" in that library, and
implies that a table named "wx" will have things loaded into it.
It would be nice to call it "wxlua.so/dll" to really ensure
uniqueness, but I think it's ok as is for now.
Regards,
John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
wxlua-users mailing list
wxlua-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users
